Case Study: Secondary Timesheet? Tracking Secondary Employment

Timework Case Study: Timecard Fraud Through Secondary Employment

The Pittsburgh Police Sergeant Incident

Timework Overview

In June of 2024,Pittsburgh Police Sergeant Brian Marckisotto was charged with theft by deception and unlawful use of a computer after it was discovered that he falsified timecards related to a second job. The case reveals a growing concern in law enforcement and other high-trust professions: time fraud related to off-duty employment, especially when oversight is minimal.

Timework Key Metrics and Timeline 

Secondary Employer: Target (East Liberty location)

Period of Alleged Fraud: February–March  2024

       

Total Overpayment: $5,752.50                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Charges Filed: Theft by  deception, computer fraud

Employment Status: Unpaid  administrative leave

Systemic Weaknesses Highlighted

Lack of Cross-Departmental Oversight

No effective mechanism for tracking hours worked across dual employers (City of Pittsburgh and Target)

Risk of schedule overlap, fatigue, or intentional time inflation when working multiple jobs.

Manual or Isolated Timekeeping System

Separate systems allowed for exploitation without immediate red flags

Timeclock fraud was only detected after video footage contradicted claimed hours

Delayed  Detection

Fraud occurred over multiple pay periods before being flagged by a colleague.

     
Lessons Learned

Secondary  Employment Policies Must Include Time Audits
         
Without unified tracking systems, secondary jobs create blind spots in wage validation.

  • Real-Time  Verification Needed
             
    Video surveillance and internal reporting helped, but automation could’ve caught discrepancies earlier.
  • Compounding Risk in Law Enforcement
             
    When trusted personnel commit fraud, the fallout extends beyond dollars—it impacts public trust and internal morale.

Timework Conclusion

Although this case study doesn’t show huge numbers, The Pittsburgh case shows that even limited-timecard fraud—just 65.5 hours—can lead to $5,700+ in unearned payments and major legal consequences. Organizations should track total hours across all jobs and implement centralized systems to prevent timecard manipulation, especially in high-accountability roles. The importance of having a Workforce Management solution that can track secondary jobs, and integrate with key systems is as prevent as ever.

 

Additional Case Studies

Unlock the Potential
of Your WFM Program

Discover the Timework difference & drive workforce ROI
Let's Talk